Home / State Guides / Illinois

Illinois PERA Teacher Evaluation Guide

Navigate Illinois's Performance Evaluation Reform Act requirements with confidence using compliant observation tools

ISBE Compliant
850+ IL Districts
Student Growth Ready

Understanding Illinois PERA

The Performance Evaluation Reform Act (PERA) requires Illinois districts to evaluate teachers using both professional practice and student growth measures. The system aims to provide meaningful feedback for continuous improvement while ensuring accountability.

4 Performance Levels

Excellent to Unsatisfactory

70/30 Split

Practice vs. Student Growth

Local Flexibility

District-designed systems

PERA Evaluation Components

70%

Professional Practice

Based on classroom observations using approved framework

Formal Observations

Pre-conference, observation, post-conference

Informal Observations

Brief classroom visits, walkthroughs

Professional Responsibilities

Planning, communication, professionalism

30%

Student Growth

Measurable student learning and progress

Type I Assessments

State assessments where applicable

Type II Assessments

District-wide assessments

Type III Assessments

Teacher/school-created measures

Note: Districts may adjust the 70/30 weighting through joint committee agreement, but professional practice must remain the predominant factor.

Illinois-Approved Observation Frameworks

Danielson Framework for Teaching

Most widely adopted in Illinois (80%+ districts)

1
Planning & Preparation

Content knowledge, student understanding, objectives

2
Classroom Environment

Respect, culture for learning, procedures

3
Instruction

Communication, questioning, engagement

4
Professional Responsibilities

Reflection, records, communication

Alternative Approved Frameworks

Other ISBE-approved options

Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model

Research-based with 60 elements

Illinois 5Essentials Survey

Climate and culture focused

Marshall Rubric

Streamlined evaluation approach

District-Developed (w/ ISBE approval)

Custom frameworks meeting state standards

Illinois Performance Rating Levels

Excellent

Exceeds standards consistently

Implications: Model teacher, mentorship opportunities

Proficient

Meets standards consistently

Implications: Standard progression, continued employment

Needs Improvement

Below standards in areas

Implications: Professional Development Plan required

Unsatisfactory

Does not meet standards

Implications: Remediation plan, possible dismissal

Student Growth Measurement

Assessment Types for Student Growth

Type I

State Assessments

IAR (Illinois Assessment of Readiness), SAT

Used for grades 3-8 ELA/Math, Grade 11

Type II

District-Wide Assessments

MAP, STAR, i-Ready, district benchmarks

Comparable across schools in district

Type III

Teacher/School Assessments

Performance assessments, portfolios, SLOs

Rigorous, aligned to standards

Requirement: At least one Type I or Type II assessment must be used if available for the grade/subject. Type III can supplement but not replace when state/district assessments exist.

Observation Requirements by Category

Non-Tenured Teachers

  • Minimum Observations

    At least 3 observations annually (1 formal, 2 informal)

  • Evaluators

    Qualified administrator trained in framework

  • Feedback Timeline

    Written feedback within 10 school days

Tenured Teachers

  • Minimum Observations

    At least 2 observations in evaluation year

  • Evaluation Cycle

    At minimum every 2 years if rated Excellent/Proficient

  • Professional Development

    Self-directed growth plan in non-evaluation years

Annual Evaluation Timeline

August
Orientation & Planning

Review evaluation plan, set student growth goals

Sept-Oct
Initial Observations

Begin formal observation cycle

November
Mid-Year Check-In

Review progress on student growth goals

Jan-March
Continued Observations

Complete remaining required observations

March 1
Non-Tenured Notification

Deadline for non-renewal notices

April-May
Summative Evaluation

Final ratings, including student growth data

Legal Requirements & Compliance

PERA Requirements

  • Student growth must be "significant factor" (30% minimum)
  • Joint committee must develop evaluation plan
  • Evaluators must complete required training
  • RIF decisions based on performance groupings

Best Practices

  • Regular calibration sessions for evaluators
  • Clear communication of expectations
  • Timely, specific feedback
  • Focus on professional growth

Illinois PERA Resources

Frequently Asked Questions

How does RIF (Reduction in Force) work under PERA?

PERA requires RIF decisions to be based on performance categories. Teachers are grouped by rating (Group 1: those without ratings, Group 2: Needs Improvement/Unsatisfactory, Group 3: Proficient, Group 4: Excellent). RIF proceeds from lowest to highest group, with seniority as tiebreaker within groups.

Can student growth be more than 30%?

Yes, districts can weight student growth up to 50% through joint committee agreement. However, most Illinois districts maintain the 30% minimum to keep professional practice as the primary factor.

What is a Professional Development Plan?

Teachers rated "Needs Improvement" must be placed on a Professional Development Plan within 30 school days. The plan must include specific areas for improvement, supports to be provided, and timeline for improvement (typically 90 school days).

Do all teachers need annual evaluations?

Non-tenured teachers require annual summative evaluations. Tenured teachers rated Excellent or Proficient can be evaluated at minimum every 2 years, with professional development activities in non-evaluation years.

Streamline Your Illinois PERA Evaluations

Simplify PERA compliance while focusing on meaningful teacher growth with our Illinois-specific tools.

PERA-compliant • Danielson-aligned • No credit card required